Myodynamics

 

Muscle Testing (Computer Scenario)

Most people have had the experience of downloading files, maps, pictures, documents etc. from the internet. In the case of downloading a single file, considering the computers we have today and a good internet connection, the file would typically download rather quickly. When a computer performs a single command or process, this is referred to as single tasking. The major focus of the computer’s energy from the central processing unit is utilized to satisfy a single task.

When we direct the computer to download more than one file simultaneously we refer to this function as multi tasking. The response from the computer reveals a greater demand upon the central processing unit and is evident by each task being accomplished slower.

When using a muscle or set of muscles for biofeedback, we can compare this activity with the multi tasking scenario above.

For an example, if I have an arm extended from the body and am asked to keep it strong when a facilitator pushes down on my wrist, the typical result would be a strong steady response. This would represent a single task. All the energy or signal needed to satisfy the request is available and directed by the un-conscious mind through the autonomic nervous system. Now, lets observe any difference in muscle response when we add another task. This time I am asked to declare my name and immediately told to be strong, then tested. The result again is a strong steady response! I might have expected a weaker presentation; however, my system response revealed no stress when declaring my name. My un-conscious mind was in agreement with my name and all the available energy from my system was utilized in keeping the arm strong. This example did not represent actual multi tasking.

Another example: I am asked to declare a false name and then told to be strong and tested. The response is a weaker arm, a diminished response. The arm drops down reflecting a greater load to the system, in effect eliciting a true multi tasking experience, revealing stress at the un-conscious level. The available energy from the system had to be shared in order to process the “untruth.” Therefore less energy was available to keep the arm strong!

The benefit from this experience is the ability to use muscle testing as a reliable biofeedback process to detect stress at the un-conscious level. We can use this ability to perform a survey of un-conscious programs/beliefs. This method can reveal stressors that often create dis-ease and manifest in life threatening conditions. After recording the issues that cause a stress response, we use PSYCH-K methodology to resolve the internal conflicts and free us from those beliefs that elicit stress at the un-conscious level.

MUSCLE TEST COMPARISONS OF CONGRUENT AND INCONGRUENT SELF-REFERENTIAL STATEMENTS. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1999, 88, 1019-1028, DANIEL A. MONTI, Jefferson Medical College, JOHN SINNOT, Horsham, Pennsylvania, MARC MARCHESE, King's College, ELIZABETH J.S. KUNKEL, Jefferson Medical College, JEFFREY M. GREESON, Thomas Jefferson University.

Summary

This study investigated differences in values of muscle tests after exposure to congruent and incongruent semantic stimuli. Muscle testing with a computerized dynamometer was performed on the deltoid muscle group of 89 healthy college students after repetitions of congruent (true) and incongruent (false) self-referential statements. The order in which statements were repeated was controlled by a counterbalance design. The combined data showed that approximately 17% more total force over a longer period of time could be endured when subjects repeated semantically congruent statements (p < .001). Order effects were not significant. Overall, significant differences were found in muscle test responses between congruent and incongruent semantic stimuli.

"Candy for the Inquisitive Mind"

 

We Invite You to

Experience the Energy and Passion of an International Educator
Step out for yourself, step out for the world. Be the miracle!

"Peace and Health through Love and Education"
Dr. Steven Anthony
The Academy for Advanced Healing International

Dr. Steven Anthony is an International Educator Specializing in PSYCH-K and Per-K. He teaches both the Basic and Advanced PSYCH-K Courses. As a seasoned instructor Dr. Steven Anthony enjoys sharing his unique experiences as a clinician.

Contact

Academy for Advanced Healing International
Box 55
Homelake, CO 81135-0055

(719) 588-0356

e-mail to academyadvancedhealing@hotmail.com